An interesting question emerged from some discussion surrounding my last carbon tax post. How big will the tax be? The letter says $40 a ton, but then rising. But how far? And in response to what question?
It occurs to me that the two obvious targets lead to radically different answers.
1) The social cost of carbon. This is what economists usually think of as the appropriate Pigouvian tax. In order to pollute, you pay the cost you impose on others by your pollution.
Even the worst-case scenarios now put the cost of carbon emissions at 10% of GDP in the year 2100. Discount that back, divide by all the carbon emitted between now and then, and, you're going to get a pretty small tax.
2) Temperature or quantitative guidelines. Or, "whatever it takes to stop the global temperature from rising more than 1.5 degrees C." Such a tax has to be high enough to basically stop us from using fossil fuels. It would be radically higher, and impose economic costs far higher than 10% of GDP.
When you set a goal of a quantity with no attached price, the price can get pretty high.
I see now some of the back and forth chatter. Anti-carbon types warn that any tax "won't be enough." Now I know what they mean.
So who sets the tax, and on what basis, are important issues we're all fudging over.
Of course, a cynic would take the view that the tax will be set to
3) Maximize government revenue.
Given the behavioral elasticities, that is likely to be a good deal less than #2, as to high a tax will quickly erode the tax base.
from The Grumpy Economist http://bit.ly/2RZ7177
Monday, 21 January 2019
Carbon tax update
Artikel Terkait Carbon tax update :
Interest rates and inflation -- part 1Today I begin a three part series exploring interest rates and inflation. How does the Fed influence inflation? Is the rece ...
FTPL at SEASunday Nov 19 6-7 PM I will be giving the "Association Lecture" at the Southern Economics Association conference in New Orle ...
Political prisoner dilemmaThis is a draft oped. It didn't make it as events in Israel are now consuming attention. But sooner or later we need to elect a p ...
Interest rates and inflation part 3: TheoryThis post takes up from two previous posts (part 1; part 2), asking just what do we (we economists) really know about how i ...
A Kind Word for the Fed This is my first post over at Substack. Follow me here and let me know if it isn't working. The post is in prais ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment